@Sleepyguy saidFrom Saint Charlie Kirk:
GFY with your white nationalism. Save that crap for Sam the Sham.
We need people to come in. We should just have control over who it is, accepting those who have the means to support themselves, have the skills we need, and in the numbers we need.
"Now, the southern border is, of course, the great replacement. They're trying to replace us demographically. They're trying to make the country less white."
https://www.mediamatters.org/charlie-kirk/charlie-kirk-southern-border-course-great-replacement-theyre-trying-replace-us
@Sleepyguy saidLet's go down memory lane a bit. First, remember Biden's speeches during his campaign encouraging asylum seekers to come to the US. You can go find the quotes if you want but the message was basically "If you want some asylum you should come.", and they did.
Let's go down memory lane a bit. First, remember Biden's speeches during his campaign encouraging asylum seekers to come to the US. You can go find the quotes if you want but the message was basically "If you want some asylum you should come.", and they did.
Then, on Biden's inauguration day in January 2021 he stopped building the border wall, leaving something like $300 ...[text shortened]... or doing.
The high horses y'all think you're riding around on are just a bunch of tiny jackasses.
I know; here's Biden preaching for them to come to America 50 years ago now; check it out loser.
&list=RDk3WMdz37ku4&start_radio=1
It sure shows us what a pos country we've become since Trump; that's for-sure....
2 edits
@vivify saidThe longstanding complaint of conservatives, is that illegal immigration could be handled if the corrupt/inept a-holes in charge would just enforce the damn law. It goes back to Reagan pushing through amnesty for illegal aliens who had broken the law, with a promise of enhanced enforcement after the fact.
Executive orders can be turned over by the next president. Passing a bill is more long term.
You'd think for an "emergency" Republicans would want a long term solution by passing a bill instead of leaving it up to president who's legal term ends in 2 years.
There's clearly no sense of urgency by Republicans to make sure borders are secured based on their actions.
It didn't work out. Three million lawbreakers got their amnesty, the enforcement petered out, and we learned that amnesty first with enforcement later was a lie.
By the time Bush Jr and Rove were pushing the next big amnesty ("path to legalization" ) in the mid 2000's, there were supposedly 12 million illegals in the country, and we had to fight Bush and the GOP squishes to kill it. It was tough going because big donors to GOP wanted the cheap labor.
Then came the "Gang of Eight" effort in the Senate, the "if you want a border wall and enforcement of the law, you have to accept amnesty" bill. Boehner let that die in the House because he new the base vehemently opposed it. This was the start of the Tea Party movement. Their message: Enough was enough. If you want to have a conversation about amnesty, just enforce the damned law, build the wall, secure the border, and then maybe we can talk about it.
Along the way, the base started to despise the DC RINO's that were pushing the amnesty. McCain, McConnell, Graham, Cornyn, Flake, and we still remember Rubio too. They all got a big wake up call when the Tea Party grass roots took out Eric Cantor in 2014.
So now, with the border finally secured, and illegal immigrants getting deported as they should be, it finally feels like someone is enforcing the law as they always should have been, and the idea that we need some new legislation doesn't compute.
@Sleepyguy saidSo...pass a bill. You control Congress.
The longstanding complaint of conservatives, is that illegal immigration could be handled if the corrupt/inept a-holes in charge would just enforce the damn law.
Unless the border isn't really a big deal.
@vivify saidCutting taxes is more important to them than legally enforcing border law.
So...pass a bill. You control Congress.
Unless the border isn't really a big deal.